System analysis of Design-to-code automation tools

Table of contents

No heading

No headings in the article.

Introduction

A design-to-code automation tool is a software application that allows designers to create visual designs, such as wireframes, mockups, and prototypes, and then automatically generates the corresponding source code, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Design-to-code tools are quite significant in the process of software development because

  1. Design handoff to developers is more efficient

  2. Development process is faster since it eliminate the need of coding from scratch

  3. It helps business quickly prototype an idea

  4. Consistency in design with the help of reusable components

  5. It takes away the burden of managing a design system

  6. Cost efficient for businesses

Purpose of this document

This document has been created to carefully outline the working principles of design-to-code automation tools, their strengths and weaknesses.

Use cases

Design-to-code automation tools are most useful in certain use cases and shouldn’t be the go to choice for all scenarios. These tools are most useful in the following scenarios.

  1. Rapid iteration and development

  2. Efficient design handoff to developers

  3. Consistent design systems

  4. Exporting designs to multiple platforms

  5. Automated code generation

  6. Collaboration between team members

Analysis of existing systems

The following systems were analyzed to understand the operational principle of design to code systems and to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The following sections will showcase the strengths and weaknesses of the different systems collectively. A more comprehensive outline can be found in the appendix A.

Systems analyzed

  1. TeleportHQ

  2. Anima

  3. Handoff

  4. Clutch

  5. Hadron

Working principle

The websites designed by these systems can be static or dynamic. Implementations that support dynamic websites offer the users the option to connect to an external database. In either case, the approach taken by these system to develop interfaces can be categorized into three parts

  1. Design of the interface is performed within the system

  2. The system supports importing designs from 3rd party tools like Figma.

  3. A combination of the previous two approaches

Systems which are capable of importing designs from 3rd party tools require a plugin to be developed through which users can link their design created on 3rd party systems to the system. After the design is linked users can make changes to the file within the system. In some cases, changes are synchronized between the system and the 3rd party system.

Current design to code systems have a rich user interface where designers can manipulate their designs, create and manage components, pages and design systems. These interfaces also support rich mouse and keyboard shortcuts for ease of use. They also offer gestures like drag and drop, panning and zooming. Some implementations offer a feature where developers can write custom code. This is sometimes made possible via codepen or a custom implementation.

After the design has been concluded, you can either host the website through their system or export your designs to code to be hosted yourself. In most cases, the former is the case. However, for systems that support hosting, they provide the option to either use a custom domain or a default subdomain. Some implementations go as far as providing different staging environments.

Strengths of existing systems

  1. Responsive design

  2. Design system management

  3. Reusable components

  4. Real time collaboration

  5. Drag and drop

  6. Connect to a database

  7. Integration of third party APIs like unsplash, iconify for assets management

  8. Custom code

  9. Export to multiple languages and frameworks

  10. Layout manager

  11. Deploy to a subdomain or custom domain

  12. Keyboard and mouse shortcuts

  13. Hosting

Weaknesses of existing systems

  1. Custom animations on events

  2. Code quality

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have seen that design-to-code automation tools play a crucial role in the software development process, increasing the efficiency of the handoff process and also providing developers with a good starting point while carefully understanding that these tools are not to be used in all scenarios but in specific use cases.

Design-to-code automation tools can be used in development of static and dynamic pages although the dynamic pages can’t be too complex. Emphasis is placed on the fact design can be imported from third-party design softwares like Figma, sketch and Adobe XD to be edited and exported or hosted as the case may be.

The strength and weakness of these systems are outlined and these weaknesses can be improved upon to make these systems more reliable.

Appendices

Appendix A: Softwares analyzed

TeleportHQ

Pros:

  1. Works with tools familiar to developers - Figma

  2. Design and generate code on the platform

  3. Website hosting

  4. AI website generation

  5. Real time collaboration

  6. Supports code generation in React, Vue, Javascript, HTML, CSS with support for css frameworks such as TailwindCSS

Cons:

Anima

Pros:

  1. Works with tools familiar to developers - Figma, Sketch

  2. Code generated can be edited in codegen

  3. Website hosting

  4. Supports code generation in React, Vue, Javascript, HTML, CSS with support for css frameworks such as TailwindCSS

Cons:

  1. You cannot manipulate the designs within the application

Handoff

Pros:

  1. Copy and paste directly from Figma

  2. Designs can be edited within the application

  3. Supports code generation in React, Vue, Javascript, HTML, CSS with upcoming support for css frameworks such as TailwindCSS

Cons:

  1. Not in active development

Clutch

Pros:

  1. Designs are managed within the application

  2. Connects to multiple backends

  3. Multiple themes and templates

  4. Use templates from NPM or create one yourself

  5. Web hosting

Cons:

  1. Does not export to code

Hadron

Pros:

  1. Designs can be edited within the application

  2. Designs can be edited with code

  3. Layout editor included

Cons:

  1. Still in Beta testing

Appendix B: Not in active development

  1. Avocode

  2. Modulz

Appendix C: Other related software

  1. Supernova: Design systems manager

  2. Uizard: Design and ideation tool

  3. Modulz: User interface design tool

  4. Inspect by Invision: Create designs within the software and generate documentation for developers

  5. Zeplin: a version control manager for designs